I remember the old AOL promo disks, they gave away to sign up for aol but they were basically a browser and isp iirc. Or atleast thats what i thought it was when i was 10. The point being, there seemed to be a fairly large gap between paying for browser service and browsers selling your first born child's identity to pay for the fines they got for stealing people's data. Im not calling any one or the other out and if you need me to then youre already too fucked to care.
I find it very very very difficult to justify ever spending money on any SaaS and i think its the fault of the browser peeps. The few SaaS ive fucked with used to always be minitool or the otherone for data recovery. I was yound and new to the industry because i didnt have even an email address till i was 33 and that was balls deep in pandemic. The point im getting to tho is that how much fucking service and work are they really putting into a product that is basically running cli commands anyone can usually find and run. Not much changes with 99% of set up pc's so what the fuck could they be updating and slaving over that they can justify some out fucking landish prices.
The most transparent one ive used was as a trial and i did pay for a couple months. That was screaming frog... then i learned everything is already there on the internet anyway so just take the time and scrape it .anually, which lasted about a week and within a month i was able to find keys, access full databases of competators and all by not doing fuck all illegal. Im not talking big companies but still. Am i just too used to working in te mines to know most people would rather pay to have it done than learn or put the work into doing it?
Oh and i almost forgot to bring this full circle. Browsers fucking update almost daily trying to keep up with the internet demands. They always have multiple versions testing diggeremt shit, they are one of the most widely used products and/or services by just about fuckin everyone.
So thats my full circle: microsoft pays people to putout broken products that break other products theyre plugged into. Google mak3s you pay for their security that also ranks highest under most security and data breaches, tinder is just getting paid for buttfucking you into thinking your guna buttfuck someone, i cant fucking believe what they charge now. Partition wizard does the same shit prssing Ctrl and clicking start menu button does on windows (along with tons of other similar software swervice providers who just run cli commands with a gui. ALL OF THEM CHARGING AN ARM AND A LEG meanwhile ive been using ff, ddg and chrome every day got the past 20 years plus. Have never had a security issue i didnt personally cause my self or by using social media nack in the day. But looking accross the field and the players in play, what the fuck are they actually charging for and why are people still paying for the shit.
13 Jul 2026 01:30
Internet Explorer and Netscape were $39.99 each back in 1997. To beat Netscape, Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer with the third edition of Windows 95. They took a loss to gain market share.
IE, back then, being the dominant browser, is the same problem we have now with Chrome. A bad actor having control of Internet code due to a big market share in the browser market.
13 Jul 2026 01:35
They didn't, mostly. There have always been traffic deals, but otherwise:
Netscape: initially charged money for the browser, but free later.
Internet Explorer: initially charged money, bundled with Windows later. Not intended to be profitable directly, but to prevent the web from making the desktop OS where Microsoft had a near-monopoly irrelevant.
Opera: built-in banner ad, pay for ad-free.
Mozilla Suite, later pivoting to Firefox: initially nonprofit.
Safari: bundled with Apple operating systems, but also offered for Windows for a few years. Safari was never meant to make money directly, but to give Apple more control over the web experience, and probably to keep the web from competing with native apps too effectively on iOS.
Chrome: never intended to make money directly. I'm not sure the initial plan was to spy on users either; Google was a different company in 2008. Instead, I think Google really wanted a browser to make the web the application platform Microsoft feared, and found the existing options lacking.
13 Jul 2026 01:57
afaik it was always a land-grab / gold rush mentality - capture the market, then figure out how to make money later. Now, it's later.
13 Jul 2026 02:10
Which then resulted in an utterly massive Anti-Trust lawsuit against MSFT, back when the government at least pretended to give a shit.
Yes, its more complicated than that, but also, no, not really.
13 Jul 2026 02:17
The first web browser was free!! NCSA Mosaic! However since few new users had download capabilities (because they never used command line FTP before), there were software distributes making copies and selling those on store shelves for a few dollars.
To beat Netscape, Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer with the third edition of Windows 95.
Not quite accurate. Yes, at the time Windows 95 came out Netscape Navigator Personal Edition was selling on shelves for about $40-$50. If you bought Netscape Navigator Gold, it came with the Netscape browser
and and WYSIWYG HTML editor which was a big deal back then because otherwise you're using notepad to make your website.
Other WYSIWYG HTML editor sitting next to this on the self would be products like Hotdog or Hot METAL Pro:

However,
Windows 95 at launch did NOT ship with Internet Explorer. For the launch release of Win95 to get Internet Explorer 1.0 you had to buy the addon package "Microsoft Plus: Companion for Windows 95" for $49:
Internet Explorer 1.0 sucked and Netscape was far superior for the day.
One other artifact from those days. There was
another GUI operating system that was still around back then called OS/2. This was an IBM product from the 80s, and the last gasp of it occurred right before Win95 came out. IBM released OS/2 Warp (OS/2 3.0). A good chunk of the marketing was that it contained web browser (called WebExplorer). There were unsavy users buying OS/2 Warp thinking it was just an application when it was a whole replacement operating system.
13 Jul 2026 02:29
They were stand alone software you bought (Netscape Navigator) or bundled with your dial-up (AOL).
13 Jul 2026 03:17
Chrome happened because they were worried about Microsoft controlling the platform that they relied on. The google search bar for IE was crazy popular and they were worried about Microsoft wanting a piece.
13 Jul 2026 03:56
Prior to selling information, Browsers either where paid for, or bundled with something else
Cello (one of the first Graphic Interface Web Browsers) was just a paid product.
NCSA Mosaic (the first web browser that had integrated images / txt) was probably the first "freemium" software, in that the basic version was free, but more advanced stuff required a paid license.
Other browsers (Netscape, Internet Explorer) just straight cost money, windows eventually made IE free (with Windows) to gain market share, having control over the most popular OS and the most popular browser would (and has) given Microsoft an enormous amount of power that they could use on the back end to make back the investment. (Pay Microsoft or your website/game/program wont work on windows/IE).
AOL Explorer had a brower built in, but AOL was ofc selling internet connection (and other) services, so they wanted you to have a reason to use the internet, and to stay within the AOL ecosystem.
Later browsers came out for free for a variety of reasons, Chrome wanted to harvest your data to sell more adds, IE remained free because Microsoft wanted market share back (and to compete with Chrome). Safari was an attempt by apple both to gain market share, and to have more control over the internet experience.
13 Jul 2026 04:09
Chrome was initially a lightweight and fast browser, since Firefox and IE were bloated to hell. From what I understand, their aim was to make browsing faster so people could run more searches and they could make money that way. The same went for their ISP project. Higher bandwidth meant more searches/browsing and more ads being served.
13 Jul 2026 04:35
Great comment! Loved the flashbacks it gave me.
Just wanted to add some context to the quoted part of your comment:
However since few new users had download capabilities (because they never used command line FTP before)
A lot of people didn't know how to download things, sure, but another barrier was most people were on dial-up. It would take a long time, sometimes on expensive calls, to download software. And getting disconnected often meant starting over.
Even if you didn't mind downloading, it was unusual enough at the time that a lot of people probably just felt safer buying the disk from a retail store. It's tangible. So people would get software either off the shelf at the store, or free as part of another purchase.
For example, when I worked for ISPs in the late 90s, we gave every customer a floppy or CD with a dialer and a browser. One popular one among ISPs was the Netscape dialer + browser bundle that we could customize and lock down the settings we wanted, like DNS, proxy, POP phone numbers. I remember we charged $19.95/mo for dial-up in 1998, but at least you got free email and a homepage so you could put up HTML pages with animated GIFs!
Early on there were many different browsers, too. Some based on Mosaic, some independent (e.g. Opera). Netscape eventually became the most common one. I think IE may have been based on Spyglass Mosaic. Microsoft definitively felt threatened by the idea that the web and Java (applets!) could make their entire golden goose, Windows, obsolete. Write Once Run Anywhere was an existential threat to them. So, eventually they ripped out the Microsoft Network (forerunner to MSN) and put Internet on Windows instead. It took them a while, though. And that was only in Windows 95. We were using the WWW before that. (Trumpet Winsock anyone?)
Sorry for going on an old-man rant. This triggered some really crusty memories.
13 Jul 2026 04:38
Back in my day we didnโt have browsers, we used
birds.
13 Jul 2026 04:54
I just want to point out that Windows bundling Internet Explorer for free was a blatant violation of antitrust law that Microsoft should've gotten broken up for, since the other replies didn't mention it.
13 Jul 2026 07:28
ads, and datamining your personal data, if logged in to an account, using sites that the browser can track, search results is likely the biggest data mine they can get.
13 Jul 2026 07:53
and google allows Mozilla to exist because they were afraid of anti-trust laws.
13 Jul 2026 07:55