Nice, maybe we should also seize any AI sites being used to generate sexual images of minors.
Oh no wait, it’s okay if you’re a trillionaire, carry on.
14 Jun 2026 03:43
It doesn't get much more performative than that.
14 Jun 2026 03:47
Please tell me this applies to Grok
14 Jun 2026 03:59
Good. Great. Awesome.
Yet only the rich get protection, the everyday girls and women have to see their artificial nudes on X while trying to avoid their coworkers and classmates laughing about it. Two tiered justice.
14 Jun 2026 04:37
Or, yk, improve wages across the spread so fewer people feel compelled to go in that direction?
14 Jun 2026 04:42
Ive noticed they only take down stuff for politicians not underage actors or celebs or influencers or ppl in general, but anything nsfw about politicians is swiftly taken down even on reddit
14 Jun 2026 04:57
You guys can all make deep fake nudes of me if you want. I'm not saying everyone should feel like me but I promise you I would not care even one little bit.
14 Jun 2026 06:22
So long as you don't use your consent as an assumption to assume others do/should consent, then sure, great, cool, whatever. Can't help but notice your lack of pictures on your account so seems more like theoretical thing as opposed to something someone could choose to do against you.
But schools are literally being blackmailed with deep faked photos of their students. I'm infinitely more concerned for those boys and girls wellbeing that a handful of famous folk with Lawyers and PR teams.
14 Jun 2026 06:46
I'm happy to provide a picture if you think making some deep fakes would make you feel better. Also, as I said, people are allowed to be upset by whatever they choose. If deep fakes of you exist and that upsets you then feel free to rage about it all you like. I don't see the point in feeling anything more than annoyed at having to explain that the pictures are fake but, again, that's just me.
14 Jun 2026 07:37
Lemmy
Related topics
